Lincolnshire And Nottinghamshire Police Are Criminals. ( And Cambridgeshire Police )
THIS IS NOT MY FIRST POST YOU WILL NEED TO GO BACK AND SCROLL DOWN TO CORRUPT LINCOLN MAGISTRATES COURT.
MOST OF THESE POSTS ARE FROM MY PREVIOUS BLOG AND THAT WAS OVER A 2 YEAR PERIOD.
THERE WILL BE MANY THINGS ON HERE THAT ARE REPETITIVE.
I have sent a letter to criminal chief constable Chris Haward.
I have uploaded the offences of the Indictments with the letter the letter.
I have video of the letter being sealed and royal mail tracking. The Indictments included in with the letter is against Tracey Parker and clerk to the court Michael Seath, David Ward From the city of Lincoln council and PC'S 588 and 602 and last Indictment PC 512 Cook And His Dumb Blonde sidekick PC 585 Lanes.
Hello Chief Constable.
I have sent you these indictments for you to deal with.
I’m sure you won’t do anything about these indictments just like you have not bothered with the crimes I have previously E-mailed you about before as just the thought of you having to do some work to earn your money, serving the public and going after real criminals will make you vomit.
If you can give me a reply so I can update my online blog that will be great and my online blog shows you for being the worthless corrupt piece of shit that you really are.
Many Thanks.
These are the offences in the Indictments I sent to the useless Chief Constable.
IN THE CROWN COURT AT LINCOLN
URN NUMBER
Form of Indictment
Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10
B E T W E E N:
REGINA
.v.
TRACEY PARKER, CLERK TO THE JUSTICE OF THE PEACE MICHAEL
SEATH
Charged As Follows:
COUNT 1
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Conspiracy To Commit Fraud Contrary To Section 5 And Section 7 Of The Fraud Act 2006
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 7,1,20 you TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH Issued I ( redacted ) A Fake Summons To The Magistrates Court The Court House 358 High Street Lincoln LN5 7QA In Order To Make A Fraudulent Financial Gain.
COUNT 2
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Perjury Contrary To Section 1A, Section 5, Section 12 And Section 7 Of The Perjury Act 1911.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 7,1,20 you TRACEY PARKER Committed Perjury When You Issued I ( redacted ) With A Fake Summons To Appear At The Fake Magistrates Court 7,1,20 And This Was Supported By MICHAEL SEATH Thus Committing Section 7 Of The Perjury Act 1911 Aiders, Abettors And Suborners .
COUNT 3
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Misconduct In Public Office contrary to The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 7,1,20 You TRACEY PARKER Wilfully Issued I ( redacted ) With A False Court Summons To Make Financial Gain Committing Fraud And Perjury As You Have Interactions With The General public And Receive A Wage Paid for By Public Funds This Makes You A Public Officer And You Have Misconducted Yourself In Public Office.
COUNT 4
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Perverting The Course Of Justice Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
I Wrote To You TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH And Asked You To E-Mail Me To Arrange A Recorded Interview In Regards To The Crimes You Committed In regards To A Fake Court Summons I was Sent. And Both TRACEY PARKER And MICHAEL SEATH Did Not Contact Me In For A Recorded Interview
Thus Perverting The Course Of Justice By Obstructing My Investigation.
"2nd Indictment"
IN THE CROWN COURT AT LINCOLN
URN NUMBER
Form of Indictment
Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10
B E T W E E N:
REGINA
.v.
PC 512 COOK, PC 585 LANES OF LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE
Charged As Follows:
COUNT 1
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Wrongful Arrest Contrary To The Common Law.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Wrongfully Arrested I ( redacted ) For Failing To Appear At Lincoln Magistrates Court. Lincoln Magistrates Court Is A Registered Business And The Fake Magistrates And Fake District Judges Are Not On Their Judicial Oaths So No Genuine Arrest Warrant Was Issued And PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Failed to Provide Evidence Of Their Imaginary Arrest Warrant.
COUNT 2
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Assault Contrary To The Common Law.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Intended To Make Unlawful Contact To My ( redacted ) Body Without My Consent Or A Lawful Reason To Do So. According To The Sentencing Council Higher Culpability Is Anyone In A Position Of Public Trust. Such As A Police Constable.
COUNT 3
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Battery Contrary To The Common Law.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Made Unlawful Contact To My ( redacted ) Body Without A Lawful Reason To Do So. According To The Sentencing Council Higher Culpability Is Anyone In A Position Of Public Trust Such As A Police Constable.
COUNT 4
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Criminal Damage Contrary To Section 1 And Section 5 Of The Criminal Damage Act 1971.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 Ripped My Jacket When You Assaulted And Battered And Wrongfully Arrested I ( redacted ) Without Lawful Reason To Do So Apart From To Soothe Your Own Arrogance.
COUNT 5
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Kidnapping Contrary To The Common Law.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Kidnapped I ( redacted ) From Outside My Residence At ( redacted ) Lincoln *** *** "THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT
CLARIFICATION OF KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT 1.5 Kidnapping and false imprisonment are both common law offences. They are defined in case law, and not in legislation.
2.1 In the case of D1 Lord Brandon defined kidnapping as follows: First, the nature of the offence is an attack on and infringement of the personal liberty of an individual. Secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows: (1) the taking or carrying away of one person by another; (2) by force or fraud; (3) without the consent of the person so taken and carried away; and (4) without lawful excuse.
COUNT 6
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated False imprisonment Contrary to the Common Law..
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Handcuffed I ( redacted ) And Prevented I ( redacted ) From Freely Moving Away On My Own Accord After You Wrongfully Arrested Me Thus Holding Me In False Imprisonment. "THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – KIDNAPPING AND FALSE IMPRISONMENT
PART 3 FALSE IMPRISONMENT 3.1 False imprisonment is defined as “the unlawful and intentional or reckless restraint of V’s freedom of movement from a particular place”.1 This definition has been quoted without dispute in many cases.2 "
COUNT 7
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Theft Contrary To Section 6 Of The Theft Act 1968
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Removed Property Not Belonging To You From I ( redacted ) The Property You Removed Was A Kitchen Knife And I Had This Knife On Me Under Castle Law And Castle Law Document Was On Myself You Took It Off Me Into Custody Castle Law Was Imposed On My Address August 2021 And Notice Was Served To Chief Constable CHRIS HAWARD And Lincolnshire Police And Crime Commissioner MARC JONES Via E-mail Castle Law And Self defence criminal law act 1967 This Duty Never Existed When a Person Is Somewhere He Has A Lawful Right To Be But Due To The Repeal Now Extends To Public Places Etc. William Blackstone Commentaries On The Laws Of England: Not Only Was The Doctrine Considered To Justify Defence Against Neighbours And Criminals, But Any Of The Crowns Agents Who Attempt To Enter Without A Proper Warrant As Well. A Copy OF The Full Document Will Be Included With This Indictment.
COUNT 8
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Theft Contrary To Section 6 Of The Theft Act 1968
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Removed Property Not Belonging To You From I ( redacted ) The Property You Removed Was A Telescopic Baton And I Had This Telescopic Baton On Me Under Castle Law And Castle Law Document Was On Myself You Took It Off Me Into Custody Castle Law Was Imposed On My Address August 2021 And Notice Was Served To Chief Constable CHRIS HAWARD And Lincolnshire Police And Crime Commissioner MARC JONES Via E-mail Castle Law And Self defence criminal law act 1967 This Duty Never Existed When a Person Is Somewhere He Has A Lawful Right To Be But Due To The Repeal Now Extends To Public Places Etc. William Blackstone Commentaries On The Laws Of England: Not Only Was The Doctrine Considered To Justify Defence Against Neighbours And Criminals, But Any Of The Crowns Agents Who Attempt To Enter Without A Proper Warrant As Well. A Copy OF The Full Document Will Be Included With This Indictment.
COUNT 9
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Assault Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 PC LANES Arrested I ( redacted ) For Having An Offensive Weapon Contrary To The Criminal Justice Act 1988 In Re Gard's To A Kitchen Knife I ( redacted ) Have Recorded My Birth Certificate With The Common Law Court I ( redacted ) Only Stands Under Common Law You Are Imposing An Act Of Parliament On ( redacted ) Without The Consent Of ( redacted ) And Without There Being An Injured Parte Or A Risk To There Being An Injured Parte.
COUNT 10
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Aggravated Assault Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 8,11,21 You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 PC LANES Arrested I ( Redacted ) For Having An Offensive Weapon Contrary To The Prevention Of Crime Act 1953 In Re Gard's To A Telescopic Baton I ( redacted ) Have Recorded My Birth Certificate With The Common Law Court I ( redacted ) Only Stands Under Common Law You Are Imposing An Act Of Parliament On ( redacted ) Without The Consent Of ( redacted ) And Without There Being An Injured Parte Or A Risk To There Being An Injured Parte.
COUNT 11
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Misconduct In Public Office Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Are Public Officers You Swear An Oath To The Queen In Office Of Constable You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 Lanes Interact With The General Public And You PC 512 COOK And PC 585 LANES Are Paid By Public Funds Thus Making You Public Officers And As You Have Committed Offences In Public Office You Have Committed The Offence Of Misconduct In Public Office Contrary To The Common Law.
"3rd Indictment"
IN THE CROWN COURT AT LINCOLN
URN NUMBER
Form of Indictment
Criminal Procedure Rules Part 10
B E T W E E N:
REGINA
.v.
DAVID WARD, PC 588 AND PC 602 LINCOLNSHIRE POLICE
Charged As Follows:
COUNT 1
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Conspiracy To Commit Section 1 And Section 6 Of The Criminal Justice Act 1977
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 12,11,21 you DAVID WARD AND PC 588 AND PC 602 Conspired To Force Entry To The Property Of ( redacted ) Without My Consent And This While I Had 2 Notices On My Door Notice Of Withdrawal Of Implied Rights of Access And Notice Of Castle Law These Notices Were Also served To Fake District Judge PHILIP JAMES ARMITAGE And Chief Constable CHRIS HAWARD.
COUNT 2
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Fraud Contrary To Section 6 Fraud Act 2006.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 12,11,21 you DAVID WARD And PC 588 And PC 602 As you Had A Fraudulent Document Such As A Fake Injunction As DAVID WARD Bribed FAKE District Judge PHILIP JAMES ARMITAGE For An Injunction And I ( redacted ) Told PC 588 And PC 602 PHILIP JAMES ARMITAGE Was Not On His Judicial Oath.
COUNT 3
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Section 5 Public Order Act 2006
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 12,11,21 You DAVID WARD And PC 588 AND PC 602 Caused Harassment Alarm And Distress To I ( redacted ) By Threatening To Force Entry To My Property Of ( redacted ) Lincoln *** *** Even Though You Were Not Invited To My Property And You Had Not Got My Consent To Force Entry.
COUNT 4
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Perverting The Course Of Justice Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
On 12,11,21 You PC 588 AND 602 Was Informed By Myself ( redacted )
That Fake District Judge PHILIP JAMES ARMITAGE And Was Not On His Judicial Oath And Failed To Arrest Fake District Judge PHILIP JAMES ARMITAGE. And You Was Also Informed Of A Criminal Indictment Against Your Chief Constable CHRIS HAWARD And Failed To Arrest The Criminal Chief Constable.
COUNT 5
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
Misconduct In Public Office Contrary To The Common Law
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
You PC 588 AND PC 602 Have committed these Offences While In Public Office You Have Sworn An Oath To The Queen In The Office Of Constable You Interact With The Public On A Daily Basis And Are Paid By Public Funds This Makes You Public Officers By Committing Offences In Public Office You Have Committed The Offence Of Misconduct In Public Office Contrary To The Common Law.
HERE'S THE VIDEO OF THE LETTER BEING SEALED SORRY FOR MY CRAPPY CAMERAMAN SKILLS!
I sent a letter to the chief constable of Nottinghamshire branch of the Parliament Police.
And this was in regards to the Indictments I took to Nottingham Kangaroo Court and the Indictments went walkabout. I also sent the same Indictments to the chief constable as I took to Nottingham Kangaroo court to read them you will have to read my post Indictments issued.
Hello Chief Constable.
I have written this in regards to crimes that have happened in your jurisdiction.
On 18,10,21 at 12:00 in court number 9 at Nottingham Kangaroo court I mean Police court I mean Magistrates court I had a hearing to lay an information for a private prosecution and the clerk to the court took the indictments off me asked me to wait outside and she then stormed out with my indictments and came back 20 minutes later and said we can’t deal with this, this is too serious it needs to go before a judge. I told her I already knew that and then she said she will hand over the indictments over to the criminal protection service I mean crown prosecution service.
But handing them over to the criminal protection service is blocking my redress of grievance.
Blocking my redress of Grievance is committing several offences bringing a private prosecution is my constitutional right and is protected by the magistrates court act 1980 and prosecution of offences act 1985 and it is perverting the course of justice contrary to the common law maximum sentence life in prison. I have included these indictments so you can go down to the police court to try and jog their memory. I’m sure after reading the indictments you might also want these indictments to disappear.
I will be be looking forward to any response that you can give.
Many thanks.
This is the reply I got from Nottinghamshire criminals in uniform.
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
As to Accessories after the Fact:
3Accessories after the Fact may be indicted as such, or as substantive Felons.
Whosoever shall become an Accessory after the Fact to any Felony, whether the same be a Felony at Common Law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, may be indicted and convicted either as an Accessory after the Fact to the principal Felony, together with the principal Felon, or after the Conviction of the principal Felon, or may be indicted and convicted of a substantive Felony whether the principal Felon shall or shall not have been previously convicted, or shall or shall not be amenable to Justice, and may thereupon be punished in like Manner as any Accessory after the Fact to the same Felony, if convicted as an Accessory, may be punished.
4Punishment of Accessories after the Fact.
Every Accessory after the Fact to any Felony (except where it is otherwise specially enacted), whether the same be a Felony at Common Law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable, at the Discretion of the Court, to be imprisoned in the Common Gaol or House of Correction for any Term not exceeding Two Years, with or without Hard Labour, and it shall be lawful for the Court, if it shall think fit, to require the Offender to enter into his own Recognizances and to find Sureties, both or either, for keeping the Peace, in addition to such Punishment : Provided that no Person shall be imprisoned under this Clause for not finding Sureties for any Period exceeding One Year.
Perverting the course of justice contrary to the common law ( maximum sentence life in prison )
as you have committed those offences while in public office you have also committed misconduct in public office contrary tot the common law ( maximum sentence life in prison )
THE POLICE ARE CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM!!!
I will be looking forward to your next fob off response.
VictimLiaison.EastMidlands@cps.gov.uk
4/8/2022 at 5:09 PM
Dear Mr ( redacted )
I am in receipt of your email dated 1 April, addressed to Chief Crown Prosecutor, Janine McKinney, the contents of which are noted. I would suggest that you obtain independent legal advice in this matter.
You are expressing dissatisfaction at your interaction with the police and HMCTS. The issue of a private summons is obviously nothing to do with the CPS who have no power to direct the police to investigate a crime.
Should you wish to make a complaint about officers from Nottinghamshire Police, full details of how to do this can be found on their website https://www.nottinghamshire.police.uk/complaints, which also advises that other ways of doing this are by emailing psd@nottinghamshire.pnn.police.uk, by writing to Professional Standards Directorate, Police Headquarters, Sherwood Lodge, Arnold, Nottingham NG5 8PP or by calling 101 and speaking to a customer service advisor.
Lincolnshire Police offers members of the public the opportunity to write about any concerns via its website https://www.lincs.police.uk/contact/af/contact-us/
Enquiries regarding Nottingham Magistrates’ Court should be directed to them using the email address: enquiries.nottingham.countycourt@justice.gov.uk. For Lincoln Magistrates’ Court the address is li-lincolnmcadmin@justice.gov.uk
I hope this assists you.
Yours sincerely
Jacqui McVittie
SPA to Chief Crown Prosecutor, Janine McKinney and Area Business Manager, Adele Clarke
CPS East Midlands
2 King Edward Court | King Edward Street | Nottingham NG1 1EL | DX 729100 Nottingham 48
cambs-pcc@cambs.pnn.police.uk
From: "
To: nick.dean@cambs.pnn.police.uk
Subject: ARREST WARRANTS.
Good afternoon
Thank you for your email to the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough in relation to a number of arrest warrants.
The Commissioner and his office are a separate legal entity to that of Cambridgeshire Constabulary and as such by law cannot get involved in operational policing matters, such as you have described.
I will however, forward your email onto Cambridgeshire Constabulary for them to respond to you directly.
Kind Regards
Claire
Claire Dicker
Business Support Officer
Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Email: cambs-pcc@cambs.police.uk
Tel: 0300 333 3456
Web: http://www.cambridgeshire-pcc.gov.uk/
Follow us on social media
rebecca.wood2@lincs.police.uk
PO Box 999
LINCOLN LN5 7PH
Fax: (01522) 558491
Telephone: (01522) 947125
E-mail: dataprotection@lincs.pnn.police.uk
Our Ref: 004788/21 30 November 2021
Mr
Dear Mr ( Redacted )
Re: Right of Access under DPA 2018 – 004788/21
I write in reply to your Subject Access Request in which you requested details of:
Crime report, statement, custody record, interview record, body worn
video/photographs and incidents, warrant issued September 2021
The Data Protection Act 2018 places an obligation on the Police when holding
personal information to provide a copy of that information to the individual concerned
on request unless an exemption applies.
As the above case is on-going and/or subject to criminal proceedings, the above
material is exempt from disclosure under Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 2 of the
Data Protection Act 2018.
Information is exempt from disclosure where provision of that information could
prejudice the Police’s ability to discharge their statutory functions in respect of
preventing and detecting crime or apprehending and prosecuting offenders.
With regards to on-going investigations, disclosure via the Subject Access route will
not be permitted until the conclusion of such investigations and any subsequent
criminal proceedings so as not to prejudice those proceedings.
Please liaise with your legal advisor (defence solicitor) on the relevant criminal
disclosure process which is governed by the Criminal Procedure and Investigations
Act 1996 and separate from the Subject Access request route.
Please note that if you are not satisfied with the way Lincolnshire Police processed
your request, you can apply to the Information Commissioner’s Office at:
https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint/ or seek to enforce your rights through the
courts.
If you wish to discuss the content of this letter further, please feel free to contact the
Data Protection Department on the above details.
Yours sincerely,
Data Protection Unit
Dear Mr
Thank you for your email dated 25 April 2022.
The Constabulary does not have any involvement in communications you have with the Court. If you are concerned that criminal offences have taken place we would advise you to call 101.
Your sincerely
Kim Campbell
Chief Constable’s Staff Office
Kim.Campbell@cambs.police.uk
Comments
Post a Comment